View Poll Results: How were your June 2009 CAT Exams?
Expecting a Prize 1 6.67%
There were no surprises 4 26.67%
I would get 50 marks 2 13.33%
It was harder than i expected 1 6.67%
I gave my 100% lets hope for the best 5 33.33%
I am disappointed 2 13.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2009, 08:37 PM   #1
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: accahelp.com
Posts: 606
Default CAT June 2009 Exams Comments

Any comments after CAT exams?

Share here please.

Was any question too difficult or too easy?

was the exam time pressured?

Had any problem with the invigilating staff ?
__________________

acca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 07:04 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: malaysia
Studying: T5 T7
Posts: 53
My Mood:
Default

Originally Posted by acca View Post
Any comments after CAT exams?

Share here please.

Was any question too difficult or too easy?

was the exam time pressured?

Had any problem with the invigilating staff ?
this year t5 ques too difficult to score mark
caster 87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 07:59 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: karachi
Studying: F1 F4 F5 F6
Posts: 13
Default

it's too easy paper of t5 & t6 on the june 2009
90adnan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 05:39 PM   #4
Vip for Dec 2009
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nicosia
Studying: T5 T6 T9
Posts: 2
My Mood:
Default

Originally Posted by acca View Post
Any comments after CAT exams?

Share here please.

Was any question too difficult or too easy?

was the exam time pressured?

Had any problem with the invigilating staff ?
I have done t5 and t6, and i will have the t9 exam on tuesday.

This is the second time am having t5 exam. First time when i started CAT. I dont know if it was the fact that i studied a lo more than the previous time, but it seemed to be easier. Fayol's was the last thing i was waitting to 'enter' the exams, because its a really 'common' theory (defining common as; t5 last exams were really difficult to identify and know the theories). It was a pleasent surprise. Internal VS External audit was also a good question to achieve points for those who are in the profession. Conflicts it was not a 'bad' question, i found it easy because i studied it, but i guess for people that werent noticing any /details' it was difficult.

About t6, I think that everyone was waitting a more 'calculation' approach, as the last question was dedicated to the theory part. In addition to that, from what i heard in the general discussions at the end of the examination, students were more ready for a consolidation or cash flow statement. I think that everyone would have scored better marks, if a consolidation or cash flow statement were replacing the partnership question or the theory question.

Overall, i think t5 was more easier than t6 and this is not an objective opinion as for both of the papers I studied the same thing (past papers, revision kit, reading text).

You will have my opinion for t9, after tuesday.
mplishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 07:20 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: caribbean
Studying: T4 T5 T6 T7
Posts: 2
Default

T5 was okay,T9 was way too easy wish it was a bit more challenging and T10 was very difficult,totally unexpected.
trinishelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 09:26 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: pakistan
Studying: F4 F5 F8 P1
Posts: 5
My Mood:
Default

how to secure 90% marks in f4
daria is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2009, cat, comments, exams, june

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.